[p2p-sip] BOF approval
philip_matthews at magma.ca
Fri Sep 29 12:22:19 EDT 2006
I completely agree with Eunsoo.
We should focus on the charter and any concerns that people have with
As much as I would like to have technical discussions, I don't think
is the right place to have them.
Technical discussions should happen at a separate ad-hoc meeting
(if we can arrange one).
On 28-Sep-06, at 20:57 , Eunsoo Shim wrote:
> I suggest we just discuss the charter during the BOF.
> We could add a presentation of draft-willis-p2psip-concepts-01 just to
> make sure we share the terminology used in the charter.
> If we can agree on the proposed chater during the BOF, we are
> what we have to achieve in the coming IETF meeting.
> If we need to discuss other stuffs, we can have a separate meeting as
> another ad-hoc.
> Brian Rosen wrote:
>> And we need agenda items. If you want agenda time, ask now.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu [mailto:p2p-sip-
>>> bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of David A. Bryan
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:01 PM
>>> To: P2P-SIP
>>> Subject: [p2p-sip] BOF approval
>>> Since more than one person has asked me in the last day or so, and I
>>> guess were a bit confused because the email Cullen sent out a few
>>> ago (21st) said "will be approved" but there was nothing else
>>> later...the BOF has been approved.
>>> Just an FYI.
>>> p2p-sip mailing list
>>> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
>> p2p-sip mailing list
>> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
> p2p-sip mailing list
> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
More information about the P2p-sip